When Martha sets dual deadlines for selling merchandise and reorganizing the break-room, which aspect of goal achievement might be questioned by employees?

The choice of relevancy as the concern when Martha sets dual deadlines for selling merchandise and reorganizing the break-room is pertinent to understanding how goals in organizational settings can be perceived. Employees may question whether these two tasks—selling merchandise and reorganizing a break-room—are aligned in terms of relevance to the overall objectives of the team or business.

Setting goals that hold meaning within the business context is essential for engagement and motivation. When employees see tasks that seem disconnected, such as sales performance and break-room organization, it can lead to confusion or skepticism about the priority and significance of these tasks in relation to the company’s objectives. Essentially, they might wonder how reorganizing the break-room contributes to sales goals.

While specificity, measurability, and being time-bound are all important aspects of effective goal setting, the primary concern raised by the dual nature of these deadlines revolves around whether the tasks are relevant to the team’s or organization’s core objectives. This lack of perceived relevance can lead to disengagement or questioning of the strategic intent behind the goals.